Post by boris on Feb 12, 2024 22:13:18 GMT 10
Modern Humans - us - have only been in Europe for 35,000 years.
Modern Humans have been in Australia - Aborigines - longer than that.
For 100,000 years Neandertals dominated Europe and ate Homo sapiens.
They made constant war on Homo sapiens and Homo sapiens only moved into Europe after the Volcano in Italy - Campi Flegrei erupted.
The reasons for the Neandertal extinction - we carry their DNA as hybrids - was they ran out of women to breed with and were inbred with family members bonking each other.
Also humans - us - could run long distances while the Neanders could only sprint fast for short distances.
Also humans had dogs and long range weapons while Neanders only had a spear they used for close quarter hunting and fighting.
So despite being super strong and being able to see in the dark and smell better than humans (they smelled bad but they had a better sense of smell) they went extinct.
If you accept they were a different species - I do not really accept that because when they crossed bred with modern humans they produced viable female young offspring - so basically the same species.
If we were two different species then the off spring would be sterile - like a mule or hinney - although it is possible to cross breed a llama with a camel and they produce viable offspring.
So if modern humans have only been in Europe for 35,000 years and Aborigines have been in Australia for 50,000 years - why did they remain in the Stone age?
They actually do have Neandertal DNA but they didn't have any flint or animals they could domesticate.
Or I could be wrong.
Modern Humans have been in Australia - Aborigines - longer than that.
For 100,000 years Neandertals dominated Europe and ate Homo sapiens.
They made constant war on Homo sapiens and Homo sapiens only moved into Europe after the Volcano in Italy - Campi Flegrei erupted.
The reasons for the Neandertal extinction - we carry their DNA as hybrids - was they ran out of women to breed with and were inbred with family members bonking each other.
Also humans - us - could run long distances while the Neanders could only sprint fast for short distances.
Also humans had dogs and long range weapons while Neanders only had a spear they used for close quarter hunting and fighting.
So despite being super strong and being able to see in the dark and smell better than humans (they smelled bad but they had a better sense of smell) they went extinct.
If you accept they were a different species - I do not really accept that because when they crossed bred with modern humans they produced viable female young offspring - so basically the same species.
If we were two different species then the off spring would be sterile - like a mule or hinney - although it is possible to cross breed a llama with a camel and they produce viable offspring.
So if modern humans have only been in Europe for 35,000 years and Aborigines have been in Australia for 50,000 years - why did they remain in the Stone age?
They actually do have Neandertal DNA but they didn't have any flint or animals they could domesticate.
Or I could be wrong.